Wednesday, July 16, 2008

The Schedule.

So, According to Politico, Congregational insiders are griping about Obama. He has not been helpful. Or whatever. Duh. Christ all mighty, were any of these people paying attention during the primaries? It was about him and only him 24/7.

Frankly, I don't much blame him for ignoring congress. Neighborhood dogs who dump on other people's lawns and bark all night are more popular than the Pelosi/Reid Congress. If I wanted to win I would not go near these people either.

This kicker of the piece is this: Other Obama campaign sources repeatedly noted that the drawn-out fight with Clinton has "put the campaign behind schedule"

What schedule? Who's schedule?

Let's state this as clearly as possible because it is a place where the sexism of this campaign is deeply embedded:

1. Candidates running for President who are winning the largest, most important Democratic states consistently have no business quitting the race. After a weak start, Clinton ran an incredibly strong primary campaign that got more powerful with each passing day. Obama's stagnated after February. The schedule these people are referring to only exists in the mind of Axlerod, Brazile, and Dean.

2. The idea that she should "quit now" started right after Iowa with Jonathan Alter's asinine critique in Newsweek. It was amplified by the media after every Clinton victory. Notice the last word please. During Clinton's string of caucus losses in February the "she should quit now" meme actually died down. Then, on cue, and bizarrely, it ramped up again after her landslide win in Ohio and victory in Texas. It ramped up again after Clinton destroyed Obama in Pennsylvania. The only "schedule" for Clinton to exit was Obama's and the media's. Not Clinton's and certainly not the voters'.

3. The complaint that "they are behind schedule" because of Clinton is EXACTLY the kind of sexism that has gone unreported on this year. There was no reason for Clinton to drop out. She suspended her campaign at the point that it made sense.

I know I just said the same thing 3 times. But is needs repeating. There was no coordinated rush by the media to see Reagan drop out in 1976 or Kennedy in 1980, or McCain in 2000. All these men were in much weaker positions in those years than Clinton was in this one.

The difference is obvious. Gender.

Get the harpie off the stage. That's what was on the "schedule".

The subtext of all the "get out now" bile from Olbermann to Huffington, to the legions of numb skulls on Kos, to Cafferty, to Alter, to Dowd, to Frank Rich, to Randi Rhodes, to Dick Morris was bigotry toward a strong female candidate. BIGOTRY. If it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck... and yes, I am saying Maureen Dowd is a sexist bigot - whether she knows it or not. Nothing seems to rattle women of faux accomplisment like Dowd and Huffington as much as a woman of real accomplishment.

Finally - the compulsion by the Obama people is to blame Clinton. But it is not her fault Obama could not close the deal. It's his.

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

There are real leaders and then there is the toastmaster from Illinois

It is disturbing to be a liberal now. I make no excuses when I say this - 2008 has made me feel old. Watching the political party you've been a member of for 28 years self immolate in order to ensure the election of a Republican will do that to a man. I make no bones about calling the neo-liberal Obama Democrats what I truly believe they are: delusional corportatists who don't care a bit about the disempowered in this society. When someone finally analyzes all the money that has changed hands in the Obama campaign the truth will finally be known. "Change" to the Obama cultists means wholesale dismissal of two thirds of the working class. When working class African- Americans realize they have voted for a New Aristocracy that is in essence the same as the Old Aristocracy, and against there own best interests - they, too, will bolt Obama's fragile coalition. It is Hillary Clinton who represents true change this year. Those with the least of everything - power, money, a voice in the process, have been represented by her not the toastmaster from Illinois. Obama has polluted the core and essence of Democratic Party values. Oh what fools these Arugulas be.

When I call myself a liberal I mean - for lack of a better term on Wednesday night - a New Deal liberal. My co blogger Lynne distilled it perfectly in a post a while ago: We believe that everyone must take responsibility for themselves, and that we are responsible for each other. What makes me a liberal still is the second half of Lynne's phrase. In an industrial and post industrial capitalist democracy the government on all levels has a limited obligation to try to level the playing field. When Obama has had the chance to improve the lives of people he has often balked. When Obama has had the chance in the U.S. Senate to stand up against the war - he has cowered. Obama is not a liberal. He is not a progressive. He is a fraud.
Exhibit A:


Rise Hillary, Rise.

Labels: ,

Friday, May 23, 2008

The Inmates have Taken Over the Asylum

Momentum

It's all about momentum.

And in spite of Howard Dean's 48 state strategy, Senator Obama's 57 state strategy and the Obama supporters state of denial strategy the momentum is going towards Senator Clinton. It's too late for Clinton but it's also too late for Obama.

When you check out Real Clear Politics and look at the reader's articles the majority are anti-Obama. They are also the ones with the most votes. Our little blog has grown like crazy once we went All Anti Obama All the Time. Other anti-Obama sites are popping up. Readership of pro-bama blogs like Kos-Co. and Avorisis have gone down. If anyone has access to the ratings of Olbermann please post in the comments but I don't know anyone who watches anymore.

People are angry. Angry that we have an antequated primary system that sets us up to lose. Angry that Dean and Brazille unilaterally dismissed two states from the country. Angry that the same press who should have learned the lesson of the consequences of going along and not questioning from Iraq have done the same thing with an untested, unvetted, unexperienced guy from Illinois.

Post Wright what has Obama won? North Carolina, although in recent polls he loses to McCain in the general and Senator Clinton wins, Oregon, latte all the way, and perhaps we can count Mississippi.

Go over to Mydd.com and look at the two electoral maps. See who wins. It sure ain't Obama.

I could have titled this post Born To Lose.

Because that's what Dean has set up for the Fall.

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, May 18, 2008

NO CLINTON! NO VOTES!

This is the best video YET on the Obama theft of the election. Get this through your head DNC - WE WILL WALK IF YOU HAND THE NOMINATION TO OBAMA. Shut the Freud up is kicking ass and taking names later.

Labels: , ,

Change

This campaign, endless as it is, has had a positive effect on me.

I have, indeed, CHANGED.

It has taught me that I will no longer judge a candidate by the letter at the end of his name but on the content of his character. (Thank you Dr. King)

Having been lambasted for not being a Democrat because I cannot support Senator Obama I am no longer a Democrat. I believe we call that a self fufulling prophecy. I wonder how many other people feel the same way?

I have tremendous respect for Senator Brownback. I disagree with most of what he believes in but I still respect him for the courage of his convictions. And, please, check facts before you start yelling because Senator Brownback and Senator Obama wrote an op-ed together on Darfur.

I worked for Senator Larry Pressler from South Dakota. He was the one who turned down the money in Abscam. He was scary smart, a bit of an absent minded professor, and a very nice man. About half of his staff in Washington were Democrats.

I like Lindsey Graham. Once again, I don't agree with him but I respect his service to our country.

I don't care for Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi.

I still love Bill Bradley, and not just because he was going to introduce me to Bruce Springsteen. I still admire Jimmy Carter. They disagree with me on who should be the nominee but I can see past that because they are more than that.

There are still more Democrats that I prefer than Republicans, Jack Murtha, Barbara Boxer, Diane Feinstein, John Conyers, Bill Nelson, Debbie Wasserman-Shultz, Barney Frank, Tom Lantos, Tip O'Neill, FDR, Jack Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, Bill Clinton and, of course, Hillary Clinton.

But I will no longer be taken for granted by the Democrat party and I am no longer going to pull the lever for "d" across the board.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Profiles in Courage?

Back in the day, when we used to watch Countdown, Mr. Olbermann had a running story about how Bush played the terror card to stop the momentum of Senator Kerry during his presidential bid.

Does this sound familiar?

Senator Clinton soundly defeats Senator Obama in West Virginia. The following day Edwards and NARAL announce their endorsement for Senator Obama.

Senator Clinton wins Ohio. Two or three superdelegates come out for Obama.

Senator Clinton wins Pennsylvania. Two or three superdelegates announce their support for Obama.

David Broder had an interesting piece in the Washington Post about Jack Kennedy's 1960 campaign. Jack Kennedy went to West Virginia and campaigned hard even though he was projected to lose. He convinced anti-Catholics that he was the better choice. He compared Kennedy's campaign to Obama's. Obama decided not to talk to the people of West Virginia. What happened to his promise to unite and talk to everyone?

One commenter pointed out the Senator McCain went to Selma (the first Republican Presidential candidate to do so.)

I read about McCain's visit to Selma and also his visit to Memphis. Regarding his visit to Memphis, I thought, McCain is a lunatic, he's gonna get chewed up and spit out. I read how the crowd of several hundred African Americans in Memphis that day yelled at him, taunted him, called him a liar. When McCain talked about how he was sorry for not voting for the MLK holiday, one black man toward the front said, "It's okay, we all need some forgiveness every now and then." That's what I will remember about his Memphis visit, a white man standing near the balcony where MLK was shot dead and a black man acknowledging McCain's mistake and forgiving him.


Lest we forget, Senator Obama took his name of the ballot in Michigan because he thought he was going to lose. He didn't bother campaigning in person (except for one visit) in West Virginia because he was going to lose. (He actually outspent Senator Clinton in the state 2-1.)

How can we support someone for President who doesn't bother showing up unless he's guaranteed a win? How does that translate into someone willing to go to the mat for us with all the problems coming down the pike? Where's the courage in that?

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

W4W

I just received an email from NARAL. They have "exciting" news. No, I haven't won a free abortion. They have decided to endorse Senator Obama.

To quote Bob Dylan, "you just want to be on the side that's winning."

UGH.

I sent them an email back that I am supporting Senator Clinton and I believe they have made a mistake. In their email they wanted to let me know that if Senator McCain wins I won't be getting my free abortion and women in this country will be in back alleys using coat hangers again.

It's hard to be believe that an organization that came about in the era of the ERA is going to go against a woman who fought for the ERA and who's campaign is justification for the ERA.

With all the misogyny directed at Senator Clinton by the Obama campaign and his supporters, Olbermann, et al, you would think a woman's advocacy group would stand up for Women.

And I also wonder at the timing. Senator Clinton trounces Senator Obama yesterday in West Virgina and they come out today with their endorsement? It's a little fishy.

But what isn't fishy about Senator Obama's campaign? Someone please tell me where all the money is coming from because I don't buy for a second that it's all from individual donors.

Like Move On, there goes another organization I won't be giving any money to anymore.

Thank God for Oxfam & Save Darfur.

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Mountain Mama

Clinton obliterates BHO in West Virginia. She then made the best speech of the campaign. I will get it up ASAP.

Labels: ,

Friday, May 09, 2008

Holy Similarity, Batman!

Riddle me this. What's the difference between Bush supporters and most Obama supporters today (at least the ones who comment on blogs)?

Me: I don't support going into Iraq
Neocon: You aren't patriotic

Me: I don't support Senator Obama
Obama Supporter (OS) You aren't a democrat

Me: I support Al Gore because he is smart, capable and experienced
Neo: I want to have a beer with George Bush

Me: I support Hillary Clinton because she is smart, capable and experienced
OS: Obama gives me hope!

Me: I want to know about Bush and his national guard service
Neo: Liberal Media Liberal Media Liberal Media Dan Rather is a jerk

Me: I want to know more about Obama's connections with Ayers, Rezko and Wright
OS: No more debates. He's answered the question! Charlie Gibson is a jerk

Me: The press is in the tank for Bush and won't vet him
Neo: Al Gore created the interets

Me: The press is in the tank for Obama and won't vet him
OS: White Water, Monica, Travelgate

Me: I think it's disgusting that Bush called a reporter an asshole
Neo: He is!

Me: I think it's disgusting that Randi Rhodes called Senator Clinton a "fucking whore"
OS: She is!

Me: I want all the votes in Florida counted
Neo: Bush won!

Me: I want all the votes in Florida counted
OS: They broke the rules!

Add any answers that you wish.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, May 08, 2008

Political Healing

The Hippocratic Oath - FIRST DO NO HARM

Oh, Dr. Dean. You have destroyed the Democratic Party. What were you thinking telling us in Florida that we don't count? Michigan? Hail to the Conquering Hero's? No, you told them they don't matter either. I'm hoping for protests when Obama comes to campaign here. You wouldn't count our votes but you want to count our money? No thanks.

You wanted Senator Clinton to pull out to give you time to "heal" the party. Now the buzz is that Senator Clinton should stay in because it would be embarrassing for Obama if she wins Kentucky and West Virginia after pulling out. We can't have the golden child embarrassed can we?

I thought merit mattered. I thought experience mattered. You went another direction. You and Donna Brazille have pushed for Senator Obama to be the nominee and in a year where Democrats should blow the Republican nominee out of the water you've assured us another crushing defeat. Wow. I never would have thought of that.

Supposedly those of us who won't vote for Obama in the general election just feel this way because of the heat of the battle and we will come around come the fall. Good luck with that. We have been told that we are unimportant to the party. We're uneducated, we're not smart enough to see the greatness that is Obama. Yeah, it's going to take more than flowers to bring us back.

We have the most ridiculous method for choosing a nominee. Shouldn't we have a process that mirrors the general election? Might just give us an idea of who could win. If a candidate cannot win the big ones in the primary, California, New York, Florida, Texas (which I'll admit will probably be red) Massachusetts, how is he going to pull out a victory in November. Aren't most states winner take all in the general? Yet we have a convoluted "let's please everyone" system that is the equivalent of a gift bag for all at a six-year-old's birthday party. We can't have anyone's feelings be hurt. Don't get me started on Caucuses. We'll give you two hours to choose a candidate. It will be great. Oh, you can't make it because you have a job? These things happen.

I will give Obama credit for winning almost all the I's: Iowa, Illinois and Idaho. I'll give his campaign credit for being well run. We have seen that a well run campaign doesn't translate into a well run Executive Branch. Bush & Rove sure knew how to campaign; they had no idea how to govern.

I'll say to Senator Clinton - where was James Carville when you needed him? What were you thinking with Mark Penn? Why didn't you push back when it was obvious that the media was in the bag for Obama?

It's a sad day for us, as Democrats and former Democrats, that we started this process with a plethora of qualified candidates and we ended up with Obama.

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

And now the final act...

The road forward is tough for Clinton. She should win large victories in West Virginia and Kentucky in the next 2 weeks. This probably will not do much to move things in her direction. I believe the only thing that can sink Obama now is a revelation so harmful the S.D.'s go running into the night. Allusions abound about such a bit of info - but I certainly know of nothing. If being employed by a terrorist for 8 years doesn't get coverage by the major media I can't imagine what will. It would have to be a "Spitzeresque" meltdown - to coin a phrase.

We do need to start thinking about the crack up of the Democratic Party and decide if this is a bad thing. I am not sure it is. The exit polls indicate a severe fissure. I admit to having a moment of not caring one wit for the Democratic party tonight. Donna Brazille's behavior on CNN is appalling and Howard Dean is a disaster. Pelosi has accomplished nothing and Harry Reid acts like the mayor of Mayberry - not the majority leader. This is not the party of FDR, Truman and Bill Clinton. If working class whites and rural voters have to walk out - so be it.

BHO will be the nominee of college students, college professors, independents and African Americans, apparently voting for him solely because of his race. Good for them. But this is not the Democratic Party I care to be identified with. I won't vote for BHO in the general. It is a relief to know this. An Obama rout in the general might have a silver lining.

Clinton's speech tonight had an undertone that seems to indicate she knows the mountain just got too high. But I have been wrong more than I have been right this year - I admit to my chagrin - so who knows what the week will bring.

We shall see.

Labels: , ,

Monday, May 05, 2008

The mature choice is Senator Clinton.

General Hugh Shelton's endorsement of Senator Clinton is beautifully expressed vision of why Hillary is the right choice for America. I love this speech - but I must say the picture of the person holding the sign that says :Hillary, like Bill only BETTER - won my heart.

The mature choice is Senator Clinton.

Labels: , ,

Friday, May 02, 2008

North Carolina Gov. Mike Easley

North Carolina Gov. Mike Easley's endorsement TV spot for Hill below. I love this guy's vibe. He is a an interesting choice for VP. Though, I am still partial to Jim Webb.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Some numbers

Total electoral college votes of states where Obama won the primary or caucus:
197. Of this total, the number of electoral college votes in states he will have difficulty or find it impossible to defeat McCain in a general election: 125

Total electoral college votes of states where Clinton won the primary or caucus:
284.
Of this total, the number of electoral college votes in states she will have difficulty or find it impossible to defeat McCain in a general election: 62

Number of states Obama has won: 26. Combined population of those states: 98,585,000
Of these states- the number that have gone Republican in the last two general elections: 15

Number of states Clinton has won: 17. Combined population of those states: 148,460,000
Of these states - the number that have gone Republican in the last two general elections: 4


Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, April 27, 2008

You got a problem with that?

I've heard a lot about "What's The Matter with Kansas" this campaign. I'm as guilty as anyone else of wondering about someone driving a Yugo with a Bush bumper sticker. Why vote against your economic best interests?

But what I've learned in the epic battle for the Democratic nomination is that Kansas doesn't have the problem. The Democratic Party does. Having been on the receiving end of smug, self righteous, condescending comments I now know how Kansas feels. Cheese Stakes anyone? The assumption that anyone voting for Senator Clinton shops at the dollar store (which we'll all be doing soon enough), drives a pick up truck, swills beer and shoots guns while reading the bible is bigoted.

When Senator Obama made his comments about "bitter" voters it wasn't elitist. It was obnoxious. You don't reach people by talking down to them. Which is why both Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan (who I still abhor) were so good at what they did. Bill Clinton was always the smartest person in the room but he never made anyone feel stupid. That's a tough thing to pull off.

The whole "Kansas" thing is paternalistic. We know better. Really? Howard Dean? You know better? I knew as soon as you pulled the plug on Florida it was going to be disastrous. Any fifth grader doing a report on the Electoral college could have told you the same thing. Daddy made a big mistake! But we're supposed to trust you with your fifty state strategy.

Interestingly enough, I think voters are voting for their economic best interest when they vote for Senator Clinton. The Recession hand writing is on the wall. Obama offers platitudes of hope with no substance. Senator Clinton is wonkish to the extreme and people pulled the lever for her in states hard hit by the economic bust. I don't know if she can pull us out of the mess we're in, but I do not believe that anyone else could do better.

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Shut Up!

I have problems with Senator Obama. Rezko, Present votes, lack of experience, unwillingness to answer questions, Reverend Wright, equating his grandmother to Reverend Wright, Ayers, how he won his State Senate seat, his wife. His race is one of the few things I like about him.

But I have more issues with his supporters. If you go over to ObamaPost the commenters call anyone who doesn't support Senator Obama racists. It doesn't matter what you're argument is - you are a racist.

I don't like Obama's health care plan. You're a racist.

I have questions about how Obama bought his condo and his home. You're a racist.

I do not understand how he could sit in that pew for twenty years. You're a racist.

Run an ad featuring Reverend Wright. You're playing the race card.

Obama lost in Pennsylvania because all of Senator Clinton's voters are racist. (And stupid, drunk and gun toting as a bonus!) That's really going to get Clinton supporters to vote for Obama in the General if he wins the nomination.

It's an effective way to end the conversation. Not so fab at uniting which is what he claims to have the ability to do. Just because you shout louder doesn't make you right. A mob is still a mob. To tell your opposition that they're racist and that's the only reason they're not supporting your candidate is to alienate them forever. It's not going to pull them into the fold when you need them back.

What should have been a race showing how far we've come has pushed us WAY back.

Women and blacks are both considered minorities. Blacks because they are and women because of the way we've been treated. Both groups have had to fight to get where we are.

Senator Obama has benefited from the advances; Senator Clinton helped create the advances. I would love to know if he checked the box stating he was black on his application to college. Same with Michelle. Is that racist? No, it's not, thank you very much. But I would be curious if they benefited from their race to get accepted.

Young women don't remember a time when abortion wasn't legal. They don't know about coat hangers. Older women who went out and protested for the right to choose no longer have the need. Who's going to continue the battle? The right to control our bodies has been chipped away. Parental notification, having to have a sonogram, lack of clinics have eroded the options for women.

The Civil Rights Act passed. The Equal Rights Amendment didn't.

I do not believe that Obama supporters are all sexist. It's too bad they don't offer us the same courtesy.

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Protect and Deflect

Question: What do Barack Hussein Obama and Osama bin Laden have in common?

Answer: They both have friends who bombed the Pentagon.

That's a little joke from over at No Quarter. It is funny, and has the added bonus of being true and edifying.

It pretty much sums up the fall campaign if Little Lord Obama is the nominee.

Months ago I had a few friends tell me I was being too hard on Obama on this blog. Looking back, I think I was not nearly hard enough. Back then I was only reaming him because he had no business being President. My rants were based purely on his breathtaking lack of experience - all still true - one Obamite telling me point blank that his time as a neighborhood watch captain, or what ever it was - is the same as being governor of Arkansas for 12 years. That was my first inkling that his most ardent fans had taken leave of anything the rest of us might call "reality." Back then I simply said Clinton was the better candidate and Obama's "machine" in the media and blogs was irrational and unfair. It was not until later that I realized they were nuts. The support was not based in reality. It was only after a few conversations immediately descended into me being called a racist that I gave up on rational conversation with Obamites.

The Obamites are sliming us all with a collective infantile belief that this man they love, by the simple virtue of his being present, will transform us. What he had done or planned to do is of no consequence to them. The end of the road for me with man himself was the moment in the New Hampshire debate when he told Clinton she was "likable enough." At that moment I realized that not only were his hard core supporters commit ed to the delusion - but that he was also an active participant and believer in the Obama Messiah narrative. He was not just a talented, somewhat misguided, candidate anymore. With his snotty dismissal of Clinton he became dangerous in my mind. Sadly, all my fears have been proven true.

Obama believes his glowing press. It's worse than that - he seems to think a glowing, compliant media is his birthright. An inquisitive media confronts his heretofore insulated ego. It is why being asked direct questions about Ayres is so upsetting to him. It was not anger we saw from him at first, but surprise. His utter lack of maturity is what is so dangerous.

Protect and Deflect. Other than in the debate, he took no questions in the 2 weeks leading up to the Pennsylvania vote. When he botched the debate he signaled to his supporters, via his middle finger, how they should react. Blame ABC. Blame her. Protect and deflect. Confronted with his association with Wright he gave the illusion of confronting it head on. The result of the speech on race had the effect of negating any intelligent conversation - not inviting it. He still has not explained his relationship to that church with any authority or commitment. Or even in a way that makes sense. He was there, he wasn't there. Wright is a crazy uncle, and he's my mentor. Race is the biggest issue in American life, race doesn't matter.

This is all a game to protect his ego. During his Nuremberg rallies in which thousands scream their adoration he is in his element. When he's asked a simple question while forcing a waffle down in a diner he is a snotty brat. It is all fodder for fun blog posts until one thinks about what it means to have a President with no capacity to deal with unpleasant confrontations. What are we getting with a man who says and seem to believe "to know me is to love me"? Russian Oligarchs and Iranian mullahs must be cackling with glee at the prospect of President Obama. It is doubtful he could hold massive "Got Hope?"rallies in Red Square to get through his term.

At the end of the Obama nightmare - and there will be one - I believe the first order of the day will be the evisceration of the lethal and irresponsible media. Olbermann and Huffington should be put on a rickety skiff beyond the horizon for starters. We need to wash our hands of the mindless and misleading elements in the "entertainment as news" media complex. We must demand fair and objective information or democracy is dead, dead, dead.

Secondly, if there is a Democratic Party worth having any longer, Howard Dean and Donna Brazille should be put in the stocks on the Washington Mall for a week. Dean is an anti-leader and Brazile is his henchwoman. They have destroyed the party of Jefferson, Jackson, FDR and JFK with a level of stupidity usually seen only in battery chickens. Or, worse, they are not stupid at all. They know what they are doing. Either way a week of tomato chucking at those two will, at least, restore some emotional balance.

With or without Obama I am not hopeful about the next four years. Countries get the leaders they deserve. Wayward Supreme Court justices chose Bush over Gore and we went along with it. Now superdelegates are being blackmailed with the race card to shove a megalomaniac front man down our throats. We are so unconscious about how far we have fallen in the Bush years that the next President will have a job that will be quickly seen as incompatible with democracy. Of the 3 candidates remaining only Clinton has the brass balls to stare down the oncoming tsunami and not wreck what is left of the Republic in the process.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Obama the loser


If this was a race between Hillary and Obama in a general election the race would have been called by now. See pic. Clinton's states are blue, BHO's red. She already has the needed "270 votes". Obama has proven again tonight that he cannot carry a big state outside his home state. This is a disaster for Democrats in the general election. And many of BHO's wins are in caucus states and are inherently undemocratic and misleading. Super Delegates need to think long and hard about choosing a almost certain loser in Obama. At least 13 of the states Obama has won are sure to go GOP in the fall. Only 4 Clinton states will probably go GOP.

Labels: , ,

Monday, April 21, 2008

No Quarter: Clinton only behind Obama by 9 delegates...

According to No Quarter USA as of today - if Florida and Michigan are seated - Clinton is behind Obama by only 9 delegates. Yes, you read that right: Hillary is currently 9 delegates behind Obama today and will likely be ahead tomorrow.
Also here: a fine analysis of why Obama is a disastrous choice for Democrats - the upshot - he can't win. He has yet to carry a large state other than his home state.

Labels: , ,

For Clinton: A victory, is a victory is a victory

Obama is up to something in PA. The Obamites and MSM (surrogate Obamites) are setting up an expectation game that Clinton must be sure to counter. The important thing to remember: if Clinton wins she should stay in. There is no "margin" that means she won but really "lost". That is "in the tank for Obama" media bullshit. With the Obamamedia it's always over "if- she doesn't win by this much or that much. I am sure if she wins PA the media say "she won, BUT if Clinton can't win Guam's Primary....
and so on and so forth.
Besides Obama out spent her by millions. It should be close given how much money he's spent in PA.
So Hillary:
A victory is a victory is a victory.

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, April 20, 2008

Weapons of Mass Resentment

John's post on Ted Kennedy got me thinking about the SUPER delegates who support Obama.

I wonder how much of their support is because they believe in his policies and how much is resentment towards the Clinton's.

Donna Brazile - possible the worst campaign manager ever. Is she angry at the Clinton's because she believes it's President Clinton's fault Al Gore didn't become President? (I won't say he lost the election because he didn't.) Is she jealous of the fact that President Clinton had two terms?

Howard Dean-a loser. Unfair to be booted out of the race because of the scream? True enough, but losing Iowa was really the reason he gave up his bid. Does he resent that Senator Clinton lost Iowa and came back? Or is he like Ms. Brazile and is jealous of the only Democrat who won two terms since FDR?

Ted Kennedy - one thing I'll give him is he is not hypocritical enough to suggest that Senator Clinton should abandon her campaign. And as much respect as I have for President Carter he was beatable. Obviously. But Ted Kennedy couldn't do it.

John "Windsurfing Madness" Kerry - TWENTY KNOTS - HOLD MY CALLS! Let the Swiftboaters go unanswered for way to long and then once it had started to fade brought it right back into the spot light. Could not have run a worse campaign from a phone booth in Yankton, South Dakota with no change. Of course he comes out for Obama, they're cut from the same cloth. He must wonder, how did I lose to that schmuck and how did Clinton get to win?

Gary Hart. Nursing old resentments because the super delegates "gave" the nomination to Mondale. In actuality, he had less pledged delegates than Mondale but he had won the last contests so he argued that he had momentum on his side and should be the nominee. Odd, that he would support Obama.

Tom Dashle - blames President Clinton for making him Minority Leader.

Nancy Pelosi. Please vote this woman out. Right now she is the highest ranking woman in Washington. She doesn't want to give that up.

Huffington and Dowd - also don't want another woman to do better than them

Olbermann - who knows? He's lost his mind and his viewers and neither are coming back.

You can blame President Clinton for a lot. I was angry about the blow job because it was wrong and it diminished the good that he did. But the way all of the people above talk about him now you would think he lost, like them.

I'm supporting Senator Clinton, whether she is on the ballot or not. I am not afraid of a strong woman.

Here's my quote of the day:

Ms. Michaux and Ms. Prigg may be among the "bitter" people Mr. Obama was talking about -- a teacher, Ms. Prigg has no health insurance and says she may lose her house because her salary won't cover the monthly mortgage payments.

But both women said they're sticking with Mrs. Clinton.

"I felt back in the 1990s when the Clintons were in, I lived pretty good, and now my life is going down the tubes, like everyone else's," said Ms. Prigg. "When I met her in Pittsburgh eight years ago, I told her, Hillary, no matter what you run for, anyone who stays with Bill deserves my vote, and she loved it."

"I feel like I AM Hillary Clinton," she said. "Strong women are all Hillary Clinton."
Thank you very much Ms. Prigg, I couldn't say it any better.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, April 19, 2008

Ted Kennedy, 1980, and the B.S. about Clinton needing to get out if....(fill in the blank)

Let me say this here because the MSM won't. If Clinton wins Pennsylvania by 1 vote she should stay in. There is no "margin" she needs to win by to justify her on going campaign. The idiotic Howard Dean, who is apparently an ego with a body attached, should shut his pie-hole. He's run the DNC into a ditch. Ditto for the very unwise and biased Donna Brazille - whose claim to fame is she ran Gore's campaign in 2000. A campaign in which Gore lost his home state. You go, Donna!
Ted Kennedy's campaign in 1980 is instructive.
From wikipedia:
In 1980 Carter was still able to maintain a substantial lead even after Kennedy swept the last batch of primaries in June. Despite this, Kennedy refused to drop out. On the platform on the final day Kennedy, for the most part ignored, Carter.
The delegate tally at the convention was:
Jimmy Carter - 2,129
Ted Kennedy - 1,150
14 others - 66
Teddy K. refused to drop out with a deficit of 979 delegates. This was against a Democratic incumbent President. Clinton now has a 140 delegate deficit against BHO. 4 more super delegates threw their support to Clinton this week. Bet you didn't hear about them on MSNBC.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

The debate tonight.

I did not watch the debate tonight but by all accounts Hillary cleaned Obama's clock. He was, at long last, asked about his friend the terrorist, William Ayres.

Labels: , , ,

Hillary, drop the Ayres bomb.

Clinton needs to say directly to an audience and before cameras "I believe Senataor Obama should explain his relationship to William Ayres."

Hillary, drop the Ayres bomb now.

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

The Philly Mayor: Hillary Gets It.

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, April 10, 2008

The Xanax Candidate.

A number of factors have driven this blog toward its harsh criticism of Obama and his campaign.
1. His supporters. 2. The Candidate. 3. The media bias. 4. The stupidity of Howard Dean and the DNC.

Tonight I will write about the first reason:

His supporters

I have been upset by his supporters for a good, long while. In the olden days - before Keith Olbermann blew a cog and it became clear the media was going to massage Obama and attack Hillary shamelessly - it was, in fact, only his supporters who bothered me. I was still open to the man and what everyone kept repeating was his "transformational" message.

It was his supporters that began the end of any romance I might have had with Obama. As early as last spring any good words for Hillary on message boards at places like the Huffington Post were quickly and viciously attacked by swarms of Obama fans. Often they amounted to "our guy is better" and "it's time for a change" - both are fair enough assessments if you feel that way. Then -with ample coaching from the writers on these blogs - the comments turned overtly hateful toward Clinton. Again - if one must come up with reasons - this too seems within bounds for blogs. They are the Left's answer to Talk Radio - and the "callers" had much pent up frustration with the war and everything else. If you can't stand being hated you had better not get into politics. I still believe the comments then were contextualized by an overriding desire for a clean break. This is another sentiment I don't adhere to (there are no clean breaks in history, believing there are or can be is a delusion) but it is a legitimate impulse. Every leader is a reaction, in some measure, to the one before. Besides, Obama has proven he will not be a "clean break" with his wavering on the war and support for its funding as a Senator. So the "clean break" Obama seems to represent is another amorphous illusion based entirely on - wait for it - HIS RACE. The honest answer would be: If he wins I won't be embarrassed by our President anymore. That is what they were saying.

Then Obama fans became a mob. I am not sure exactly when. For me it may have been one night not long ago that I posted this on a large liberal blog: Can anyone tell me why they think Obama would be a better Democratic President than Clinton? The comment conversation was flying that night but I got no bites - so I wrote it again. Soon the roof fell in. I used my last name (Smart) so the obvious insults were first. Then the long knives came out on Hillary. It was no longer dislike or even hate - it had solidified into mindless fury. "Bitch" "Liar" "Murderer" and the cute, yet smug as shit, "Billary". Bitch and Billary are insults based squarely in sexism. Sexism exists in America. Everyone with a brain knows this. What was startling is the glee and unconsciousness these liberals - men and women - indulged in rampant gender hatred. One person did write a long list of BHO's "accomplishments" - fine - but even if true (many were not) they simply were no comparison to Clinton's, so it hardly answered the question. I was, of course, told I was a Republican ("troll" in the Americablog vernacular)so I should go directly to hell. I am not a Republican - but even if I was I asked a legitimate question. The nastiness kept up. I have done this on other blogs at other times and the result is the same. No answers, just bile. Insane, baseless attacks. The cognitive dissonance between the "message of hope" these Obama supporters said they adhered to and the crap being thrown on the walls of liberal blogs was obvious to anyone who could reason. Thank God, a backlash began. The Daily Kos was boycotted by pro Clinton writers. Taylor Marsh said, in essence, hold on a minute! No Quarter USA is doing fine work on the Obama cabal and its deceits.

Still, the Pro Obama wing of the "Democratic" party became nastier and more strident. ( I use quotes here because I have come to believe that except for African Americans, Obama's support among rank and file Democrats is clearly a "Deanite" rump minority and does not represent the Democratic Party's values and voters. Final voting tallies will support this.) Again, "nasty" and "strident" are not deal breakers for me. This became the deal breaker: beyond the amorphous slogan "hope" and the fallback slogan "change" there is STILL no intelligent rational for Obama's support. No centering issue. No "New Deal". Nothing. The speeches are not part of the campaign. THEY ARE THE CAMPAIGN. The "uplifing" race speech has inspired us indeed- to stop talking about race and by default stop talking about Wright and his influence on Obama. But that's where that "major" speech ended.

The more strident the Obamites become, the more this lack of policy ballast becomes clear. Which is why attacking Clinton is the rational for supporting Obama. Arianna Huffington was first out of the gate here. She began the slow, smug burn of Clinton in 2006 - or before - for reasons I strongly suspect are about her psychological make up. I saw her on the campaign trail for her ex husband in 1994 when he ran against Diane Feinstein. The contempt for any strong women beside herself was evident then as it is now.


But for me the show stopper and final straw was Olbermann's idiotic rant about Fererro. More than Chris Matthews smarmy sexism, it defined the lack of reason, fairness, decency and proportionality that are the Obama supporters currency. That "special comment" was the moment I realized that Obama fever was a sickness that had spread far and wide. The fact that the Wright tapes broke the next day and Keith busied himself with excuses for BHO drove the point home.

As Lynne wrote about this morning: The Obama sickness's main symptom is an utter and complete inability to see reality clearly. Whether it be an obvious, and harmless, observation about race to a small newspaper, or the snide dismissal of the last Democratic President, or even the disconnect between Obama's statements about Iraq and his actions regarding the war as a U.S. Senator. Reality DOES NOT MATTER to Obama's supporters. The clear antecedent here is Cheney/Bush and WMD's.

Thought experiment:
Compare what they said about Ferarro with the excuses they fling about BHO's 20 year tenure in his church. I think Obama can and should go to any church he wants to for 20 or 200 years. I also WILL NOT BE TOLD THAT IT DOES NOT MATTER what went on in that congregation. I will not check my brains at the door for Obama's or Olbermann's convenience.

Or try this: Randi Rhodes verbal vomitting is being excused under the banner of "freedom of speech" - as if anyone said she did not have the RIGHT to say what she said. She does. Now imagine this: Rush Limbaugh is speaking to a crowd of the like minded and says "Obama and Jesse Jackson are a couple of lazy spooks." Would anyone DARE make excuses for this based on "freedom of speech"? Of course not. There would be hell to pay.

Yet the Obamites march on - calling themselves "liberals".

And before anyone screams "unfair!" I say bullshit. THEY ARE THE SAME REMARKS in spirit and intent.
Calling 2 women "fucking whores" and calling 2 black men "lazy spooks" is directly analogous in this society given its history. To say that the long fight for women's equality is less important in this election year than the long march away from chatel slavery based on race is bullshit. On a stick. If you think not it is because sexism is more deeply imbedded than racism. Period. "Whore" and "Bitch" still get thrown around with ease. This is not because they are less hateful - they are simply still acceptable.

So the beat goes on.

Say this to an Obamite: Rezko - the answer is "does not matter"

Say: He lied about his law teaching resume: Does not matter.

Say: He lied about the Kennedy family and the Selma march: Does not matter.

William Ayres: Does not matter.

Race baiting in South Carolina: Doesn't matter, she deserved it.

20 years in that church: Get over it! We have to get past it. We're not going there. He made a speech...etc, etc.. (again the SPEECH is what is held up as absolution. Not the reality of 20 years in that church and overtly lying about his presence there.)

Bosnia: OH MY GOD SHE'S A LIAR!!! She has problems with the truth. Usually ending with "controlling" which is code for bitch.

Xanax is a marvoulous drug. It directly obliterates one thing and nothing else: anxiety. There are a few side effects: drowsiness, and memory problems. Obama is the Xanax candidate. He relieves his supporters of their fears and all they have to do is take a dose. But once the drug wears off nothing has changed. The problems that caused the anxiety remain.

Finally, I can only assume that Obama's supporters cannot answer the simplest question - why him? - because they cannot afford to. They know, and we all know now, there is no answer. He's not better on the issues, he loses on the leadership front (he has shown no ability to lead without a large crowd and a teleprompter. There simple is no comparison between the 2 candidates on leadership. ) there is no contest when it comes to work ethic, and there is nothing in his history, once vetted, that indicates an ability to follow through and achieve stated goals. His experience - and there is some - adds up to mayor not President.

He can't win a campaign based on reality. His supporters know it so they avoid it.

One PS: whether it is now or in the fall - Rev. Wright and his connection to Obama will not go away. This is the defining event in this campaign. It defines him. He even says so. In print. The media has put up a protection shield around Obama and Wright- but it will be broken. If anything proves the unfairness of the media and the free ride Obama has gotten it is the Wright tapes.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Monday, April 07, 2008

A joke that says it all.

Big thanks to ESQMANAGEMENT for sending me this gem:


Senator Clinton was taking Dalai Lama to see the Statue of Liberty.
During the boat ride the Tibetan leader's shawl is caught by a breeze and blows away.
The security detail goes into panic mode - scrambling about in disarray since the shawl has great religious significance.

Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton